all - Opinion Summaries

UNIV. OF W. VIRGINIA v. VANVOORHIES

Contracts, Intellectual Property, Patent
A university patent policy, which broadly applies to all university personnel and does not specify that the university's ownership is subject to...

HOOP v. HOOP

Intellectual Property, Patent
In appeal from preliminary injunction enjoining an applicant from patent infringement of an earlier applicant's motorcycle fairing guards, the court...

IN RE: BERGER

Intellectual Property, Patent
Because appellant's original claims did not include a material limitation of a later claim added to the application, which copied prior art from...

SYMBOL TECH., INC v. LEMELSON MED., EDUC. & RESEARCH FOUND.

Intellectual Property, Patent
The equitable doctrine of laches may be applied to bar enforcement of patent claims that issued after an unreasonable and unexplained delay in...

ANDRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. BIOVAIL CORP.

Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Under 21 USC 355(j)(5)(B)(iii), a district court has no authority in a drug patent infringement action to shorten the FDA's thirty-month stay of...

PHARMACHEMIE, B.V. v. BARR LABS., INC.

Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Drug licensee seeking to appeal an Abbreviated New Drug Application decision for marketing a generic drug before the expiration of a patent has a moot...

EZ DOCK, INC. v. SCHAFER SYS., INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Evidence that patent holder sold only one copy of an invention after being asked for one, did not place it for sale, and provided the buyer with free...

BROWN v. BARBACID

Intellectual Property, Patent
A senior party does not have the burden of proof to show that its date of invention is before the priority date shown by the junior party.

ALBERT FUEL SYS. PATENTS CO. v. UNOCAL CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Patent for gasoline reformulation for gas "having a boiling point range of 121--345-F", applies to gas that has a "final" boiling point of 345...

RHEOX, INC. v. ENTACT, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Where applicant disclaimed a term during prosecution history to overcome examiner's prior art objection, the patent claim will not cover the...