all - Opinion Summaries

TECHSEARCH, L.L.C. v. INTEL CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent
In this infringement case dealing with complex computer microprocessor technology, the district properly articulated the claim construction and...

IN RE: KOLLAR

Intellectual Property, Patent
The offer of a license under a patent and a description of the invention, without more, does not fall within the on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. section...

ADANG v. FISCHHOFF

Intellectual Property, Patent
Although the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences erred in its count construction, its findings that plaintiff's application would not have...

IN RE: SASTRY

Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
The PTO's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences' rejection of patent claim directed to a composition for treating and preventing HIV based on...

ECOLAB INC. v. PARACLIPSE, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
In a dispute over an allegedly infringing insect trap, because there was sufficient evidence to support a jury verdict of infringement under the...

PICKHOLTZ v. RAINBOW TECH., INC.

Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
In an infringement action concerning encryption for the prevention of piracy of computer software, the proper construction of the claim's term...

LEGGETT & PLATT, INC. v. HICKORY SPRINGS MFG. CO.

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trade Secrets
The district court correctly construed the disputed claim term and hence found no literal infringement of a box spring assembly, however, genuine...

GRIFFIN v. BERTINA

Intellectual Property, Patent
Because the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences properly construed count as including preamble and "wherein" clauses, and thus required...

ENZO BIOCHEM, INC. v. GEN-PROBE INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
The district court did not err in granting summary judgment that the claims of a patent, which is directed to nucleic acid probes that selectively...

WEISS v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INS. CO.

Contracts, Insurance Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Where the plain meaning of an "advertising injury" was defined in subject insurance policy as "piracy" and "unfair competition," the term did not...