all - Opinion Summaries

JASMINE NETWORKS, INC. v. MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

Evidence, Intellectual Property, Patent, Trade Secrets
Preliminary injunction, restraining use or disclosure of a transcript of a conversation among defendant's officers and lawyers that was inadvertently...

PHILLIPS v. AWH CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trade Secrets
Summary judgment of non-infringement is affirmed; the vandalism-resistant modular wall panels disclosed in plaintiff's patent have baffles oriented at...

NORIAN CORP. v. STRYKER CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Summary judgment of non-infringement is reversed as to plaintiff's patented kit, used to produce a calcium phosphate composition for repair of bones...

NOVARTIS PHARMS. CORP. v. EON LABS MFG., INC.

Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent
Summary judgment of non-infringement is affirmed in a case concerning a patented formulation for administering cyclosporin as a hydrosol. "Hydrosol"...

GAUS v. CONAIR CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent
As a matter of law, defendant's hairdryers do not infringe plaintiff's patented safety mechanism, either literally or under the doctrine of...

UNOVA, INC. v. ACER INC.

Contracts, Intellectual Property, Patent
The settlement agreement between plaintiff and Compaq did not release Hewlett-Packard from liability for infringement of plaintiff's "smart battery"...

DYNACORE HOLDINGS CORP. v. U.S. PHILIPS CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Judgment of noninfringement is affirmed. The accused products, which incorporate technology that facilitates the design of networks compliant with an...

MONSANTO CO. v. BAYER BIOSCIENCE N.V.

Agriculture, Intellectual Property, Patent
Summary judgment of noninfringement, inequitable conduct, and collateral estoppel was erroneously entered for plaintiff in this declaratory action;...

CHIRON CORP. v. GENENTECH, INC.

Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent
Because of a failure to satisfy the written description requirement, plaintiff is not entitled to priority back to 1984 for claims broadly construed...

SUMMIT TECH., INC. v. NIDEK CO., LTD.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Insufficient evidence supported the jury verdict of infringement as to two patents covering basic aspects of laser eye surgery technology; judgment as...