all - Opinion Summaries
Page 130 of 141
Showing Result 1291 - 1300 of 1406
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
SEARLE v. WYNDHAM INT'L, INC.California Court of Appeal
Commercial Law, Consumer Protection Law, Labor & Employment LawAn unfair business practice complaint, based on a hotel's practice of treating a room service charge as compensation to its employees, is not... |
10/21/2002 | D039145 |
PETER v. GC SERVS. L.P.United States Fifth Circuit
Consumer Protection Law, Debt CollectionA debt collection letter did not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Act) where challenged language did not demand payment in a specific... |
10/18/2002 | 01-21027 |
MCSTAY v. I.C. SYSTEM, INC.United States Second Circuit
Class Actions, Consumer Protection Law, Debt CollectionIn a putative class action, ambiguity in a letter as to when the thirty-day period to dispute a debt would begin to run was not sufficiently confusing... |
10/16/2002 | 01-9392 |
LACHAPELLE v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP.California Court of Appeal
Commercial Law, Consumer Protection LawA lessee has a right to rescind a lease agreement, notwithstanding its assignment, for a violation of the Vehicle Leasing Act, only if the violation... |
10/09/2002 | A093355/095611 |
NIELSEN v. DICKERSONUnited States Seventh Circuit
Consumer Protection Law, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Debt CollectionWhere a letter sent by an attorney falsely suggested that an attorney had become actively involved in a credit card company's debt collection... |
10/09/2002 | 00-2780/81 |
THOMPSON v. HAYNESUnited States Federal Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Consumer Protection Law, RemediesSale of swivel devices constituted a willful violation of the Lanham Act, the Oklahoma Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and unfair competition. Award of... |
09/30/2002 | 01-1392 |
IQ PRODS. CO. v. PENNZOIL PRODS. CO.United States Fifth Circuit
Consumer Protection Law, False AdvertisingFailure to label a product in keeping with Federal Hazardous Substances Act regulations does not constitute a false or misleading statement that is... |
09/23/2002 | 01-20764 |
CUNDIFF v. BELL ATL. CORP.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Communications Law, Consumer Protection Law, Public UtilitiesThe Public Utilities Commission does not have exclusive jurisdiction over a suit arising from rental charges for obsolete or nonexistent telephones,... |
09/12/2002 | B151296 |
ROSENBLUTH INT'L, INC. v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (SERRANO)California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Consumer Protection Law, Corporation & Enterprise LawPurported victims in an Unfair Competition Law (UCL) case, large corporations that have individually negotiated written contracts with the defendant,... |
09/05/2002 | B158675 |
IN RE: LINERBOARD ANTITRUST LITIG.United States Third Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawA putative class in an antitrust lawsuit, alleging that linerboard manufacturers violated the Sherman Act, met the requirements of FRCP 23(b)(3). |
09/05/2002 | 01-4535 |
Results 1291 to 1300 of 1406