Skip to main content

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 117 of 141 Showing Result 1161 - 1170 of 1406
Description Date Docket #

GAVALDON v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORP.

Supreme Court of California
Consumer Protection Law, Remedies
A service contract, purchased to supplement the factory warranty accompanying the purchase of a new automobile, is not an express warranty within the...
05/27/2004 S104477

KELLY v. FLEETWOOD ENTER., INC.

United States Ninth Circuit
Civil Procedure, Consumer Protection Law, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Injury & Tort Law, Remedies
Because plaintiff's loss of enjoyment and punitive damages claims are not recoverable under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, their federal claims fail...
05/27/2004 03-35050

JIAGBOGU v. MERCEDES BENZ USA

California Court of Appeal
Consumer Protection Law, Contracts
Under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, the right of a buyer to compel a manufacturer to reimburse the purchase price or replace the vehicle is...
05/24/2004 B163974

KENNEDY v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, NA

United States Fifth Circuit
Banking Law, Consumer Protection Law
Plaintiffs, denied credit after responding to pre-qualified credit card offers, fail to state a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. A "firm...
05/06/2004 03-30811

TMI INC. v. MAXWELL

Array
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Consumer Protection Law, Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Trademark
Defendant's website, complaining about plaintiff company, was a non-commercial gripe site, did not violate the anti-dilution or the...
04/28/2004 03-20243, 03-20291

OLSON v. RISK MGMT. ALTERNATIVES, INC.

United States Seventh Circuit
Consumer Protection Law, Debt Collection
In a dunning letter, listing an amount "Now Due" in conjunction with a "Balance" figure does not contradict or overshadow the validation notice. In...
04/27/2004 03-2848, 03-2850

TAYLOR v. CAVALRY INV., L.L.C.

United States Seventh Circuit
Consumer Protection Law, Debt Collection
Plaintiffs fail to raise a triable issue of confusion arising from dunning letters they received from debt collectors. Dismissals under the Fair Debt...
04/22/2004 02-2509, 03-2578, 03-2588, 03-2590

TMI INC. v. MAXWELL

United States Fifth Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Consumer Protection Law, Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Trademark
Defendant's website, complaining about plaintiff company, was a non-commercial gripe site, did not violate the anti-dilution or the...
04/21/2004 03-20243, 03-20291

HOUSEHOLD CREDIT SERVS., INC. v. PFENNIG

United States Supreme Court
Banking Law, Consumer Protection Law
Regulation Z, which interprets the Truth in Lending Act's definition of "finance charge" to exclude charges for exceeding a credit limit, is not an...
04/21/2004 02-857

MADE IN THE USA FOUND. v. PHILLIPS FOODS, INC.

United States Fourth Circuit
Consumer Protection Law, False Advertising, Trademark
A consumer does not have standing under the Lanham Act to sue for false advertising. Since plaintiff sues as a consumer and as a representative of...
04/19/2004 03-1752

Results 1161 to 1170 of 1406

Copied to clipboard