all - Opinion Summaries
Page 112 of 115
Showing Result 1111 - 1120 of 1148
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
TELEMAC CELLULAR CORP. v. TOPP TELECOM, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Communications Law, Intellectual Property, PatentWhere nothing in the written description suggests that the patentee intended the unambiguous language to be construed in a manner inconsistent with... |
04/25/2001 | 99-1562 |
CITY OF AUBURN v. QWEST CORP.United States Ninth Circuit
Communications LawAmbiguous tariff filed with state utilities commission does not require a municipality to bear the costs of facility relocation caused by right-of-way... |
04/24/2001 | 99-36173 |
WORLDCOM, INC. v. FED. COMMUNICATIONS COMM'NUnited States DC Circuit
Communications LawAn incumbent Local Exchange Carrier's provision of DSL-based advanced services are subject to access and service offer obligations under the... |
04/20/2001 | 00-1002 |
TELECOM ITALIA, SPA v. WHOLESALE TELECOM CORP.United States Eleventh Circuit
Communications Law, Contracts, Dispute Resolution & ArbitrationAn arbitration clause does not apply to a claim alleging that defendant tortiously interfered with another contract with a third party, even if the... |
04/18/2001 | 00-10292 |
SMOOT v. UNITED TRANSP. UNIONUnited States Sixth Circuit
Communications Law, Injury & Tort LawA corporation and a union have standing to bring claims or counterclaims as a "person" under the Federal Wiretap Act, 18 USC 2510, on grounds that... |
04/11/2001 | 98-4322 |
SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYS., INC. v. TODDUnited States First Circuit
Communications LawThe Telecommunications Act at 47 USC 332(c)(7)(B)(iii) requires local boards to issue a written denial, with sufficient clarity to permit an... |
03/30/2001 | 00-1164 |
CBS, INC. v. PRIMETIME 24 JOINT VENTUREUnited States Eleventh Circuit
Communications Law, Intellectual PropertyUnder the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999, Pub. L. No. 106-113, 1001, et seq., "any termination" includes voluntary as well as... |
03/26/2001 | 98-4945, 98-5082, 98-5582, 99-10177, 99-14039, 99-14040 and 00-10386 |
ARSBERRY v. STATE OF ILLINOISUnited States Seventh Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Communications LawUnder the filed-rate doctrine, the federal court lacks jurisdiction over inmate and inmate family member claims challenging phone tariffs imposed by... |
03/19/2001 | 00-1777 |
Sunny days are here to stay.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Communications Lawasdfas d sadf df a sdf' s |
03/17/2001 | 4651 32132131 2131f31sad f |
I got you babe.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Communications Lawsdf dfsa df5ae4r 1d2s1f3ad4r 1fs1f3sa1f 3as asdfsa jflasfj fsadf asdf |
03/17/2001 | 54131 313131 |
Results 1111 to 1120 of 1148