Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 1671 of 1687 Showing Result 16701 - 16710 of 16863
Description Date Docket #

EHRET v. CONGOLEUM CORP.

California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
Under Code of Civil Procedure section 685.020, postjudgment interest should run from the date of entry of the judgment on the original jury verdict,...
02/21/2001 B141773

PEOPLE v. ALVARADO

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
The phrase "during the course of a burglary" in the One Strike law, Penal Code section 667.61, includes the period of time that a burglar remains on...
02/16/2001 H020636

WAREMART FOODS v. UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 588

California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Labor & Employment Law
Because the Legislature enacted new Labor Code sections 1138-1138.5 during the pendency of the appeal, the parties did not have an opportunity to...
02/16/2001 C032746

PEOPLE v. WILLIS

California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure
Violations of the Wheeler/Batson rule must be remedied only by quashing the venire and beginning jury selection anew with a fresh venire. Simply...
02/16/2001 B135755

SAVE OUR PENINSULA COMM. v. MONTEREY COUNTY BD. OF SUPERVISORS

California Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Environmental Law
If an envronmental impact report ("EIR") presents alternative methodologies for determining a baseline condition, the California Environmental Quality...
02/15/2001 H020900, H020933

PEOPLE v. CROWE

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
The court's charge to the jury contained language which adequately conveyed that the defendant did not have to face an actual danger in order to...
02/15/2001 B137930

PEOPLE v. AMWEST INS. CO.

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Where defendant was taken into custody on a matter which was undisputedly unrelated to the case in which appellant posted the bond, the court has no...
02/14/2001 E027310

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE v. NEVITT

California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Government Benefits
Where a parent is eligible for AFDC aid, gifts and inheritance are income for support purposes just as lottery winnings are income for those purposes.
02/14/2001 E026724

PEOPLE v. KELLER

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence
Counsel's failure to object to the introduction of certain evidence was not ineffective where the evidence was not inadmissible, or where defendant...
02/14/2001 C033613

LEE NEWMAN, M.D., INC. v. WELLS FARGO BANK

California Court of Appeal
Commercial Law
A negligence claim may be asserted against a depositary or collecting bank by an employer that has been victimized by dishonest employees who...
02/14/2001 B137139

Results 16701 to 16710 of 16863

Copied to clipboard