California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1601 of 1687
Showing Result 16001 - 16010 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
DEP'T OF HEALTH SERVS. v. SUPERIOR COURT (MCGINNIS)California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment LawBurlington/Faragher defense to Title VII sexual harassment claims is unavailable against a similar claim under California's Fair Employment and... |
11/29/2001 | C034163 |
IN RE HARRY N.California Court of Appeal
Family LawUnder Welfare and Institutions Code 366.26(k)), the "preference" for the caretaker family applies only to preference in processing an adoption... |
11/28/2001 | B145977 |
IN RE CLIFTON V.California Court of Appeal
Family LawA mother is entitled to have live witness testimony at a petition for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, where there is a... |
11/28/2001 | B148437 |
WALKER v. KIOUSISCalifornia Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort LawCivil Code section 47.5, which allows a peace officer to bring a defamation action against an individual who knowingly and maliciously files a false... |
11/28/2001 | E029822 |
BREWER v. FEDERICICalifornia Court of Appeal
Family LawUnder Family Code section 2122, disclosure of a substantial community property asset's value as "unknown" will justify setting aside a stipulated or... |
11/28/2001 | B135155 |
PEOPLE v. ROBERTO V.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceEvidence Code section 1360, which admits hearsay statements of child abuse victims, requires a court to conduct a competency hearing to determine if a... |
11/28/2001 | B142127 |
COASTAL BERRY CO. v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BD.California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment LawStrike misconduct is "serious" and justifying dismissal or denial of reinstatement of employees if "it reasonably tends to coerce or intimidate"... |
11/27/2001 | H021585 |
VAHLE v. BARWICKCalifornia Court of Appeal
Professional MalpracticeGeneral release in personal injury case that releases "all other persons" does not, for summary judgment purposes, release the plaintiff's counsel... |
11/27/2001 | A093671 |
PROVENZANO v. DEP'T OF MOTOR VEHICLESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Antitrust & Trade RegulationVehicle Code 11705(a)(14) applies to car salespersons in addition to manufacturers, transporters and dealers and allows the DMV to revoke a car... |
11/27/2001 | D036898 |
PEOPLE v. DANGCalifornia Court of Appeal
EvidenceEvidence Code 956.5, which governs attorney-client privilege, does not apply to defendant who threatens witnesses in presence of his counsel. |
11/26/2001 | B145393 |
Results 16001 to 16010 of 16863