California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1597 of 1687
Showing Result 15961 - 15970 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. MADEYSKICalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant in a civil asset forfeiture is not entitled to court-appointed counsel under Pen. Code 502.01, even if the forfeiture is related to a... |
12/14/2001 | H021820 |
IN RE: SCOGGINSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingProposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000, which mandates treatment rather than prison for non-violent drug offenders,... |
12/14/2001 | B 151619 |
IN RE: MARK L.California Court of Appeal
Evidence, Family LawEvidence Code section 1012 allows a psychotherapist to provide court with information needed to determine therapeutic progress or changed... |
12/13/2001 | D037827, D038425 |
ACTION APARTMENT ASS'N v. SANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BD.California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Landlord Tenant LawLocal rent control ordinance that required landlords to pay tenants interest on security deposits that exceeded what banks paid the landlords may... |
12/13/2001 | B146227 |
ELLARD v. CONWAYCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil ProcedureUnder Code of Civil Procedure 415.20(b), substitute service at a private/commercial post office box may be proper. |
12/12/2001 | G024339 |
IN RE: KRISTINE W.California Court of Appeal
Evidence, Family LawThe psychotherapist-patient privilege protects a juvenile's confidential communications and details of the therapy, but does not preclude the... |
12/12/2001 | D038074 |
IGNACIO R. v. SUPERIOR COURT (PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureDouble jeopardy ban against double punishment does not prohibit the state from using the same current criminal conduct to both revoke a juvenile's... |
12/12/2001 | D038164 |
PEOPLE v. SMITHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureIn an ordinary criminal case, a trial court should not appoint special counsel to represent defendant's "wishes" with respect to whether defendant... |
12/12/2001 | C036886 |
IN RE: EDWARD RAMIREZCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureThe applicable standard for reviewing parole release date decisions is the "arbitrary or capricious" standard while factual determinations are... |
12/12/2001 | A092699 |
PEOPLE v. VIGILCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureFailure of sex offender to notify government of a second address is a violation of the notification requirement under Penal Code 290(f), rather than a... |
12/11/2001 | H018367 |
Results 15961 to 15970 of 16863