California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1529 of 1687
Showing Result 15281 - 15290 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
MOUNT DIABLO MED. CTR. v. HEALTH NET OF CALIFORNIA, INC.California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & ArbitrationThe language of a contract indicated that the parties intended to incorporate California procedural law governing the enforcement of their agreement... |
08/28/2002 | A096018 |
MILLER v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY (PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureDenial of a motion to dismiss a third indictment was proper under Penal Code section 1387, permitting a third filing where 1) prior dismissal was due... |
08/28/2002 | G029632 |
CORBETT v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY (BANK OF AM., N.A.)California Court of Appeal
Banking Law, Class Actions, Consumer Protection Law, Injury & Tort LawCalifornia's Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and class actions are not mutually exclusive as a matter of law, and where a class has been properly... |
08/27/2002 | A097495 |
OAKLAND-ALAMEDA COUNTY COLISEUM AUTH. v. CC PARTNERSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & ArbitrationA dispute over an agreement related payment of premium seating in a stadium fell within the scope of an arbitration agreement, and the agreement was... |
08/27/2002 | A094859 |
SWAT-FAME, INC. v. GOLDSTEINCalifornia Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Injury & Tort LawA malicious prosecution claim was not actionable against a law firm, where the firm was entitled to rely on information provided by their client... |
08/27/2002 | B153856 |
WHITESIDE v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORP.California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Health Law, Insurance LawContracts among a patient, his insured, and a health care corporation allowed the corporation to accept additional payment from an additional insurer... |
08/27/2002 | B149093/152364 |
PEOPLE v. RANGER INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Insurance LawWhere a surety defendant wilfully and intentionally miscalculated days in which it could extend a bail bond forfeiture, summary judgment affirmed, and... |
08/26/2002 | C038457 |
CITY OF RIPON v. SWEETINCalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real EstateWhere an easement did not unequivocally entitle defendants' property to city water and sewer services, the parties are required to bear their own... |
08/26/2002 | C036592, C037212 |
IN RE MARRIAGE OF MURRAYCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family Law, Property Law & Real EstateOrder in this dissolution action, deciding reserved issues of spousal support, the division of community property, and attorney fees and costs,... |
08/26/2002 | F038685 |
JOHN Y., JR. v. CHAPARRAL TREATMENT CENTER, INC.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Labor & Employment LawThe trial court did not err when it refused to issue jury instructions related to defendants' vicarious liability for an employee's sexual misconduct... |
08/26/2002 | E029558 |
Results 15281 to 15290 of 16863