California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1454 of 1687
Showing Result 14531 - 14540 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. HERNANDEZCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureThe trial court should have bifurcated the trial of a criminal street gang enhancement from the trial of the underlying offenses, but reversal is not... |
06/23/2003 | B150342 |
PEOPLE v. BRICENOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingBecause a criminal street gang enhancement (Pen. Code section 186.22(b)(1)) cannot be used to transform an unenumerated offense into a "serious"... |
06/20/2003 | G029525, G029607 |
SANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BD. v. PEARL STREET, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Landlord Tenant Law, Property Law & Real EstateIn an action alleging evasion of rent control, a SLAPP order striking the Board's complaint must be reversed, as must the order awarding defendants... |
06/20/2003 | B157751 |
IN RE MARRIAGE OF GRAHAMCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family LawWhether husband's eventual graduation from law school might have the effect of substantially enhancing his earning capacity is speculative, making... |
06/20/2003 | G029329 |
MOORE v. ANDERSON ZEIGLER DISHAROON GALLAGHER & GRAYCalifornia Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal MalpracticeAn attorney does not have a duty to beneficiaries under a will to evaluate and ascertain the testamentary capacity of a client seeking to amend the... |
06/20/2003 | A099643 |
KIRKEBY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY (FASCENELLI)California Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Property Law & Real EstateAn action to set aside a fraudulent conveyance did not affect title to or the right to possession of specific real property so as to support a lis... |
06/19/2003 | G031262 |
SANCHEZ v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Ethics & Professional ResponsibilityThe trial court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting and dismissing plaintiffs' claim of impracticability, where the proffered reason for not... |
06/19/2003 | B157711 |
CENTURY SURETY CO. v. UNITED PAC. INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Insurance LawWhere three primary insurers and one excess insurer included "other insurance" clauses in their policies, the excess insurer is liable to contribute... |
06/19/2003 | B150373 |
CANTON POULTRY & DELI, INC. v. STOCKWELL, HARRIS, WIDOM & WOOLVERTONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal Malpractice, Workers' CompensationWhen plaintiff was dismissed from a workers' compensation case by operation of law, whatever duties defendant, who had represented plaintiff in the... |
06/18/2003 | B152610 |
PEOPLE v. JOHNSONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingA gang enhancement, Pen. Code section 186.22(b)(1), cannot be applied to counts carrying a life term (here second degree murder). |
06/18/2003 | B160112 |
Results 14531 to 14540 of 16863