United States Supreme Court

Reset A A Font size: Print

Biestek v. Berryhill, 17–1184

In a Social Security disability benefits case, addressed the effect of a vocational expert's refusal to share privately collected data. The applicant's counsel wanted to see data about the labor market that the expert had relied upon in estimating the number of jobs available in the economy for someone with the applicant's characteristics. However, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that, despite the expert's refusal to turn over this private data, her testimony could still be considered "substantial evidence" in federal court. Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the 6-3 Court.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2019/04/01

Judges

  • Kagan

Court

  • United States Supreme Court

Counsel