United States Supreme Court

ResetAA Font size: Print

Dahda v. US, 17-43

Affirming the rejection of facial insufficiency arguments relating to a wiretap order used in the investigation of a drug distribution ring in Kansas that contained a sentence purporting to authorize interception outside of the state and resulted in the interception of additional communications from a listening post in Missouri, which evidence was subsequently not introduced, but did not render the rest o the wiretap order unlawful.

Appellate Information

  • Argued
  • Submitted
  • Decided
  • Published 2018/05/14




  • United States Supreme Court


FindLaw Career Center

    Select a Job Title

      Post a Job  |  Careers Home

    View More