United States Supreme Court
Dahda v. US, 17-43
Affirming the rejection of facial insufficiency arguments relating to a wiretap order used in the investigation of a drug distribution ring in Kansas that contained a sentence purporting to authorize interception outside of the state and resulted in the interception of additional communications from a listening post in Missouri, which evidence was subsequently not introduced, but did not render the rest o the wiretap order unlawful.
Appellate Information
- Published 2018/05/14
Judges
- BREYER
Court
- United States Supreme Court