United States Supreme Court

Reversing a district court determination that inferences which once allowed the presumption that collective-bargaining agreements vested retiree benefits for life could be used to characterize them as ambiguous, permitting the consultation of extrinsic evidence about lifetime vesting, because this approach did not square with the principles of contract law guiding such interpretations.

Appellate Information

• Published 2018/02/20

Judges

Court

• United States Supreme Court

Counsel