United States Supreme Court

The rule of Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U. S. 103 (2006), that the consent of one occupant to a search is insufficient when another occupant is present and objects to the search, does not extend to the very different situation in this case, where consent was provided by an abused woman well after her partner, the defendant, had been removed from the apartment they shared.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/25/2014
• Published 02/25/2014

Judges

• ALITO

Court

• United States Supreme Court

Counsel