United States Supreme Court

ResetAA Font size: Print

US v. Woods, 12-562

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal's affirmation of the district court's holding that defendants' partnerships were properly disregarded as shams but that the valuation-misstatement penalty did not apply, is reversed, where: 1) the district court had jurisdiction to determine whether the partnerships' lack of economic substance could justify imposing a valuation-misstatement penalty on the partners; and 2) the penalty is applicable to tax underpayments resulting from the defendant-partners' participation in the COBRA tax shelter.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/03/2013
  • Published 12/03/2013

Judges

  • SCALIA

Court

  • United States Supreme Court

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center

    Select a Job Title


      Post a Job  |  Careers Home

    View More