Skip to main content

United States Supreme Court


Perry v. New Hampshire, 10-8974

In an appeal from a judgment of the State Supreme Court upholding the conviction of defendant for theft by unauthorized taking, judgment is affirmed where the Due Process Clause does not require a preliminary judicial inquiry into the reliability of an eyewitness identification when the identification was not procured under unnecessarily suggestive circumstances arranged by law enforcement.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/11/2012
  • Published 01/11/2012

Judges

  • GINSBURG

Court

  • United States Supreme Court

Counsel

Copied to clipboard