United States Supreme Court

In a dispute involving the significance of a custodial suspect's age in Miranda analysis, judgment of the appeals court affirming the denial of defendant's motion to suppress on the ground that defendant's age was not relevant to the determination of whether he was in custody is reversed, where a child’s age properly informs Miranda’s custody analysis.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/16/2011
• Published 06/16/2011

Judges

• SOTOMAYOR

Court

• United States Supreme Court

Counsel