Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Supreme Court


CIGNA Corp. v. Amara, 09-804

In an ERISA dispute involving the District Court's authority to reform a pension plan, judgment of the appeals court is reversed where although ERISA section 502(a)(1)(B) did not give the District Court authority to reform petitioner's plan, equitable relief may be fashioned from section 502(a)(3).

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/16/2011
  • Published 05/16/2011

Judges

  • BREYER

Court

  • United States Supreme Court

Counsel

Copied to clipboard