United States Supreme Court
CIGNA Corp. v. Amara, 09-804
In an ERISA dispute involving the District Court's authority to reform a pension plan, judgment of the appeals court is reversed where although ERISA section 502(a)(1)(B) did not give the District Court authority to reform petitioner's plan, equitable relief may be fashioned from section 502(a)(3).
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/16/2011
- Published 05/16/2011
Judges
- BREYER
Court
- United States Supreme Court