Skip to main content

United States Supreme Court


Dillon v. US, 09-6338

In defendant's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2), the Third Circuit's affirmance of the denial of the motion is affirmed where Booker's holdings did not apply to section 3582(c)(2) proceedings, and therefore did not require treating U.S.S.G. secton 1B1.10(b) as advisory.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/17/2010
  • Published 06/17/2010

Judges

Court

  • United States Supreme Court

Counsel

Copied to clipboard