United States Supreme Court

Reset A A Font size: Print

Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 06-923

The Supreme Court rules that the dual role of ERISA plan administrators that both determine whether an employee is eligible for benefits, and pay benefits out of their own pockets, creates a conflict of interest. Thus, a reviewing court should consider such conflict as a factor in determining whether a plan administrator has abused its discretion in denying benefits, and the significance of the factor will depend upon the circumstances of the particular case.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/19/2008
  • Published 06/19/2008



  • United States Supreme Court


Copied to clipboard