United States Supreme Court

Petitioner's conviction for drug possession is affirmed over his claim that evidence seized following police's premature entry of his home should have been suppressed since a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule does not require suppression of evidence found in a search.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/15/2006
• Published 06/15/2006

Judges

Court

• United States Supreme Court

Counsel