Skip to main content

United States Supreme Court


PLILER v. FORD, 03-221

A district court is not required to warn a pro se plaintiff bringing a habeas petition that it could not consider motions to stay unless plaintiff dismissed unexhausted claims, or that if he chose to dismiss the claims, they would be time-barred if raised in the future.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/21/2004
  • Published 06/21/2004

Judges

Court

  • United States Supreme Court

Counsel

Copied to clipboard