United States Supreme Court

The trespass policy in place at a low-income housing development owned by a political subdivision is not facially invalid under the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine, as 1) the policy does not prohibit a substantial amount of protected speech in relation to legitimate applications, and 2) rules apply to all person's entering the development, not just those seeking to engage in expression.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/16/2003
• Published 06/16/2003

Judges

Court

• United States Supreme Court

Counsel