United States Federal Circuit

Reversing a Court of Federal Claims determination that the enactment of the Wright Amendment Reform Act was a per se regulatory taking of the leaseholds of plaintiff operators of a six-gate airline terminal and a physical taking of the terminal itself because the enactment of WARA was not directly responsible for the taking, nor was it the basis for the underlying complaint, the value and loss were not sufficiently established, and the acquisition of the property through eviction was not a taking because such a seizure does not require compensation.

Appellate Information

• Published 2018/05/07

Judges

• DYK

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel