United States Federal Circuit
Waymo v. Uber, 17-2235
Dismissing the appeal of a district court's denial of an application for writ of mandamus seeking to avoid the production of a report produced at the direction of counsel in a case involving the alleged theft of driverless vehicle technology where attorney-client and work-product privilege were claimed because alternative means of relief were available, the petitioner could not establish a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief, and the district court properly determined that privilege did not apply to the discovery document at issue.
Appellate Information
- Published 2017/09/13
Judges
- WALLACH
Court
- United States Federal Circuit