United States Federal Circuit

In an infringement action involving a patent claiming plasticized soft tissue grafts suitable for transplantation into humans, the District Court's entry of a final judgment consistent with the jury's findings on infringement, validity, and damages is affirmed where the record shows that there is substantial evidence to support a jury finding that a prior art reference does not disclose a plasticized soft tissue graft under the district court's construction.

Appellate Information

• Published 2016/09/16

Judges

• PROST

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel