United States Federal Circuit
HP Inc. v. MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC, 2015-1427
In an appeal of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, finding certain claims of a patent, which discloses a method and system that extend the notion of copying to a process that involves paper being scanned from a device at one location and copied to a device at another location, unpatentable as anticipated and one claim not unpatentable as anticipated, is affirmed over HP's challenges where: 1) the Board did not err; and 2) the Court of Appeals cannot review the decision not to institute.
Appellate Information
- Published 2016/04/05
Judges
- LOURIE
Court
- United States Federal Circuit