United States Federal Circuit

In a bid protest action by the original contract awardee for aerial target flight and maintenance services, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims' denial of the U.S. Army's motion to dismiss the complaint is affirmed where: 1) the Court of Federal Claims properly exercised its jurisdiction under the Tucker Act as plaintiff both objected to a solicitation and alleged violation of statute or regulation in connection with a procurement; 2) the Court properly determined that plaintiff showed a non-trivial competitive injury and thus had standing under 28 U.S.C. section 1491(b)(1) as an interested party; and 3) the Court correctly found that plaintiff presented a claim ripe for judicial review.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/24/2012
• Published 08/24/2012

Judges

• Rader

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel