United States Federal Circuit

In an action for infringement of patents directed to automating delivery of professional services and technology for backing up client data, judgment of the district court is: 1) affirmed as to the jury verdict of infringement with regard to the valid claims; 2) affirmed in part as to the jury verdict finding the patent related to technology for backing up client data to be not anticipated by another patent, but the verdict regarding a disputed claim of the patent is reversed because that claim is invalid as anticipated by the other patent; 3) vacated as to the jury's damages award; 4) vacated as to the trial court's holdings regarding plaintiff's post-trial motions for a permanent injunction, compulsory license, prejudgment interest, enhanced damages, attorneys' fees, and a post-trial accounting; and 5) affirmed as to the trial court's denial of defendant's request for sanctions and fees.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/20/2012
• Published 08/20/2012

Judges

• O'Malley

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel