In a patent infringement suit related to a platform stabilizing a camera for filming motion pictures from moving vehicles, the district court's judgment of noninfringement is affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded where: 1) the district court's claim construction misread the context of the reexamination process and improperly emphasized a general statement out of context to limit the disputed claim term; 2) because the district court found non-infringement based on its incorrect claim construction, its grant of summary judgment is vacated; and 3) and the district court did not err in concluding that it lacked personal jurisdiction over two of the defendants.