Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


Akers v. Shinseki, 2011-7018

In a suit by a widow of a veteran, seeking an earlier effective date for dependency and indemnity compensation benefits, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims' affirmance of a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals refusing the earlier date is affirmed, where: 1) for purposes of establishing an effective date of benefits ultimately granted pursuant to a reopened claim, an otherwise proper informal request to reopen such a claim need not be accompanied by the simultaneous submission or proffer of new and material evidence; but 2) the Veterans Court's imposition of an incorrect evidentiary burden on informal claimants was harmless error, as the plaintiff's Form 9 appeal contained no evidence of any kind showing an intent to reopen her previously decided claim.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/23/2012
  • Published 03/23/2012

Judges

  • Linn

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Kenneth M. Carpenter, Joshua E. Kurland

Copied to clipboard