United States Federal Circuit
Shum v. Intel Corp., 09-1385
In plaintiff's suit for correction of inventorship of patents that lists his former business partner as the sole inventor, and various claims under California law, judgment of the district court is affirmed where: 1) because plaintiff has not identified any genuine issues of material fact with respect to his breach of fiduciary duty or fraudulent concealment claims, district court's grant of defendants' motion for summary judgment as to these claims is affirmed; and 2) district court's grant of post verdict JMOL on plaintiff's claims for unjust enrichment, breach of contract, intentional misrepresentation, and correction of inventorship for the '472 and '724 patents is affirmed as plaintiff has not presented sufficient evidence that allow a reasonably jury to find for him on these claims.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/22/2010
- Published 12/22/2010
Judges
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- PAUL F. KIRSCH, WILLIAM F. LEE