United States Federal Circuit
Minks v. Polaris Indus., Inc., 2007-1490, 2007-1491
In a suit alleging infringement of a patent for an electronic governor system for internal combustion engines, a finding of willful infringement and award of damages and attorney's fees are affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded in part where: 1) the Seventh Amendment required that plaintiff be given the option of a new trial on compensatory damages after the court reduced the jury's damages award; 2) a jury instruction on actual notice of infringement did not fairly and concretely state the issues and the law; 3) substantial evidence supported the finding of infringement; 4) there was no abuse of discretion in the amount of attorney's fees awarded; and 5) any error in a jury instruction on willfulness did not affect defendant's substantial rights.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/17/2008
- Published 10/17/2008
Judges
- GAJARSA, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Christopher T. Hill, Scarborough, Hill & Rugh, of Orlando, Florida, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Herbert L. Allen and Stephen H. Luther, Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, of Orlando, FL.
- For Appellees:
- Kenneth C. Bass, III, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief was Jon E. Wright. Of counsel on the brief was Joseph J. Jacobi, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Chicago, IL.