United States Federal Circuit

In an antidumping investigation, a judgment affirming the Department of Commerce's revision of its model-match methodology and its ongoing zeroing methodology in calculating antidumping margins for ball bearings and related parts is affirmed where the department's interpretation of the governing statute was both reasonable and supported by substantial evidence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/25/2008
• Published 08/25/2008

Judges

• LINN, Circuit Judge., Before MAYER, SCHALL, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Herbert C. Shelley, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.   With him on the brief were Alice A. Kipel and Susan R. Gihring.


• For Appellees:
  
• Claudia Burke, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States.   With her on the brief were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director.   Of counsel on the brief were Mykhaylo A. Gryzlov and Deborah R. King, Attorney-Advisors, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC., Geert De Prest, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee Timken U.S. Corporation.   With him on the brief were Terence P. Stewart and Lane S. Hurewitz.   Of counsel was William A. Fennell.