Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


Amado v. Microsoft Corp., 2007-1236, 2007-1255

In a patent case against Microsoft alleging several versions of Microsoft's Office Suite infringed plaintiff's patent, a decision dissolving a previously-issued permanent injunction and awarding plaintiff $0.12 per infringing unit sold by Microsoft during a period of a stay of a permanent injunction is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion by extending the stay of the permanent injunction, by dissolving the permanent injunction, or by denying Microsoft's motion for relief from judgment; but 2) the district court failed to adequately explain the basis for its award, and recent Supreme Court action may affect post-verdict damages.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/26/2008
  • Published 02/26/2008

Judges

  • LINN, Circuit Judge., Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and LINN, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Vincent J. Belusko, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Hector G. Gallegos, Nicole M. Smith, Brian F. McMahon, and Scott C. Moore.

  • For Appellees:
  • Joseph A. Micallef, Arnold & Porter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross-appellant.   Of counsel was James S. Blackburn, of Los Angeles, CA.
Copied to clipboard