United States Federal Circuit

In a dispute involving the correct application of the antidumping statute, 19 U.S.C. section 1673, to enriched uranium feedstock, an appeal from a judgment in the matter is dismissed as unripe as the issues appellants raised concerned only the application of certain 2005 decisions to future entries of low enriched uranium.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/21/2007
• Published 09/21/2007

Judges

• ROBERTSON, District Judge., Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE, Circuit Judge, and ROBERTSON, District Judge.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Stuart M. Rosen, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.   Eurodif S.A., et al.   With him on the brief were W. Andrew Ryu. Of counsel was Gregory Husisian., Nancy A. Fischer, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittsman LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee, AD Hoc Utilities Group.   With her on the brief were Joshua D. Fitzhugh and Christine J. Sohar.   Of counsel was Stephan E. Becker., Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branchn, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant, United States.   On the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Acting Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Deputy Director, and Stephen C. Tosini, Attorney.   Of counsel on the brief was Quentin M. Baird, Senior Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel for import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC., Sheldon E. Hochberg, Steptoe & John LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellants, Usec inc., et al.   With him on the brief were Richard O. Cunningham, Eric C. Emerson, Alexandra E.P. Baj, and Evangeline Keenan.