United States Federal Circuit

In a case concerning a patent on aircraft technology that Honeywell asserted against defendant, a judgment in favor of plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) the district court correctly interpreted the disputed terms of the patent; and 2) under the correct interpretation, a jury permissibly found that defendant infringed Honeywell's patent.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/03/2007
• Published 07/03/2007

Judges

• Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Richard G. Taranto, Farr & Taranto, of Washington, DC, argued for the plaintiffs-cross appellants.   With him on the brief were Steven D. McCormick and Atif N. Khawaja, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Chicago, IL.


• For Appellees:
  
• Howard G. Pollack, Fish & Richardson P.C., of Redwood City, CA, argued for defendant-appellant.   With him on the briefs were Michael R. Headley, John V. Picone, III, and John A. Dragseth, Fish & Richardson P.C., P.A., of Minneapolis, MN. Of counsel were Scott J. Bornstein and Allan A. Kassenoff, Greenberg Traurig LLP, of New York, NY.