United States Federal Circuit

In a case arising out of a bid protest filed by plaintiff in relation to a competitive procurement initiated by HUD for management and marketing services for single-family housing owned by HUD, a decision denying the government's motion to dismiss in light of its first proposed corrective action is affirmed, but the matter is reversed and remanded where the Court of Federal Claims improperly entered judgment for plaintiffs after the government revised its proposed corrective action.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/11/2007
• Published 06/11/2007

Judges

• Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James S. DelSordo, Cohen Mohr, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Alexander J. Brittin, Brittin Law Group, PLLC, of McLean, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellee., Sameer Yerawadekar, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant.   With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, and Mark A. Melnick, Assistant Director.   Of counsel on the brief were Kimberly Nash, Senior Trial Counsel, and Robert J. Brown, Attorney-Advisor, Procurement & Administrative Law Division, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, of Washington, DC., Margaret A. Dillenburg, Law Offices of Margaret Dillenburg, P.C., of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee.