United States Federal Circuit
Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Techs., Corp., 05-1546, 05-1579
In a patent dispute involving a magnetic braking system for amusement park rides such as drop towers and roller coasters, summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of defendant is vacated and remanded where the district court erred in construing the term "intermediary" and a limitation regarding the conducting rail.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/18/2007
- Published 04/18/2007
Judges
- RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Ted S. Ward, Berke, Kent & Ward, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- John B. Sganga, Jr., Attorney, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Joseph S. Cianfrani and Christopher L. Ross.