Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Techs., Corp., 05-1546, 05-1579

In a patent dispute involving a magnetic braking system for amusement park rides such as drop towers and roller coasters, summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of defendant is vacated and remanded where the district court erred in construing the term "intermediary" and a limitation regarding the conducting rail.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/18/2007
  • Published 04/18/2007

Judges

  • RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Ted S. Ward, Berke, Kent & Ward, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • John B. Sganga, Jr., Attorney, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-cross appellant.   With him on the brief were Joseph S. Cianfrani and Christopher L. Ross.
Copied to clipboard