United States Federal Circuit
Ryste & Ricas, Inc. v. Harvey, 06-1196
In a dispute involving a government contract for the repair and renovation of a building, summary judgment for the Army ruling that a contractor's termination settlement proposal was not timely filed is affirmed as the contractor was required to submit its proposal within one year of the effective date of termination, and failed to do so.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/16/2007
- Published 02/16/2007
Judges
- SCHALL, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- James S. DelSordo, Cohen Mohr, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Michael S. Dufault, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director; and Bryant G. Snee, Assistant Director.