United States Federal Circuit
Hydril Co. LP v. Grant Prideco LP, 2006-1188
Dismissal of antitrust, patent, and state law contract claims involving a type of pipe are reversed in part and vacated in part where: 1) the conduct alleged in plaintiff's complaint would constitute Walker Process fraud; 2) an enforcement ground for dismissal of the antitrust claim was improper; and 3) the parties did not waive the right to sue for patent infringement in a merger agreement.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/25/2007
- Published 01/25/2007
Judges
- Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Michael Hawes, Baker Botts L.L.P., of Houston, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Mitchell Lukin and David M. Rodi.
- For Appellees:
- William J. Boyce, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., of Houston, TX, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Gerard G. Pecht and Paul Krieger.