United States Federal Circuit

In a long-standing patent infringement case, an order preliminarily enjoining defendant-company and other defendants from importing certain disposable or single-use cameras is affirmed over a claim that the district court lacked jurisdiction to enjoin the importation of any cameras that were subject to a prior general exclusion order issued by the International Trade Commission.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/23/2006
• Published 08/23/2006

Judges

• RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Lawrence Rosenthal, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellee.   With him on the brief were Matthew W. Siegal and Angie M. Hankins.   Of counsel was Robert J. Rohrberger, Fox and Fox L.L.P., of Livingston, New Jersey., John M. Peterson, Neville Peterson LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant.   With him on the brief were Maria E. Celis;  and George W. Thompson, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief was Jerry P. Wiskin, Simons & Wiskin, of South Amboy, New Jersey.   Of counsel were Catherine Chess Chen, Neville Peterson LLP, of Washington, DC;  and Curtis W. Knauss, of New York, New York.