Skip to main content

United States Federal Circuit


Serio-US Indus., Inc. v. Plastic Recovery Techs. Corp., 05-1106, 05-1143, 05-1306

In a patent case involving dumpster-locking mechanisms, a judgment of non-infringement for defendant and denial of defendant's motions attorney's fees and for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) on its counterclaims of Lanham Act violations, tortious interference, and unfair competition is affirmed where the record adequately supported the trial court's claim construction and other rulings, and it properly denied defendant's motions.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/10/2006
  • Published 08/10/2006

Judges

  • RADER, Circuit Judge., Before LOURIE, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Matthew Stavish, Liniak, Berenato & White, LLC, of Bethesda, Maryland, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Peter C. McCabe III, Winston & Strawn LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-cross appellant.   With him on the brief was Matthew R. Osenga.
Copied to clipboard