Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


Gemmy Indus. Corp. v. Chrisha Creations Ltd., 05-1110

Summary judgment for defendant, pursuant to a finding that a patent involving a holiday decoration was invalid on the ground that the invention was on sale more than one year before the filing of the patent, is vacated where the on-sale issue could not be decided adversely to plaintiff on summary judgment since disputed material facts, viewed favorably to plaintiff, did not support the judgment.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/22/2006
  • Published 06/22/2006

Judges

  • NEWMAN, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • William D. Coston, Venable, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief was Martin L. Saad. Of counsel was Kevin B. Collins.

  • For Appellees:
  • Stephen J. Smirti, Jr., Rivkin Radler LLP, of Uniondale, New York, argued for defendants-appellees.   With him on the brief was Celeste M. Butera.   Of counsel was Pia E. Riverso.
Copied to clipboard