United States Federal Circuit
Gemmy Indus. Corp. v. Chrisha Creations Ltd., 05-1110
Summary judgment for defendant, pursuant to a finding that a patent involving a holiday decoration was invalid on the ground that the invention was on sale more than one year before the filing of the patent, is vacated where the on-sale issue could not be decided adversely to plaintiff on summary judgment since disputed material facts, viewed favorably to plaintiff, did not support the judgment.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/22/2006
- Published 06/22/2006
Judges
- NEWMAN, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- William D. Coston, Venable, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Martin L. Saad. Of counsel was Kevin B. Collins.
- For Appellees:
- Stephen J. Smirti, Jr., Rivkin Radler LLP, of Uniondale, New York, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Celeste M. Butera. Of counsel was Pia E. Riverso.