United States Federal Circuit

A summary judgment decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals holding that a contractor was not entitled to recover certain increased costs incurred in performing a contract for construction of a vehicle maintenance facility is reversed where the contractor's interpretation was the only reasonable interpretation that gave meaning to all of the contract provisions.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/01/2006
• Published 06/01/2006

Judges

• PROST, Circuit Judge., Before LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Johnathan M. Bailey, Bailey & Bailey, P.C., of San Antonio, Texas, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Dawn S. Conrad, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for appellee.   With her on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Deborah A. Bynum, Assistant Director.   Of counsel on the brief was Lloyd R. Crosswhite, Attorney, United States Army Corps of Engineers, of Fort Worth, Texas.