United States Federal Circuit

Dismissal of plaintiff's post-award bid protest for lack of jurisdiction under the Tucker Act is affirmed where plaintiff was not an -interested party- within the meaning of the Tucker Act.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/08/2006
• Published 05/08/2006

Judges

• MAYER, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Christopher M. Johnson, Centre Law, LLC, of Vienna, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief was James S. Phillips.


• For Appellees:
  
• Kyle E. Chadwick, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States.   With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Franklin E. White, Jr., Assistant Director., Bradley Alan Rush, John J. Fausti & Associates, LLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee Associated Aircraft Manufacturing & Sales Inc. On the brief were John J. Fausti and Monica C. Parchment.