United States Federal Circuit
Dumarce v. Scarlett, 05-1104
Partial grant of summary judgment for plaintiff holding that the enactment of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Act of 1984 effected a taking of Indian land without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment is reversed pursuant to the government's contention that plaintiff's takings claim was time-barred.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/04/2006
- Published 05/04/2006
Judges
- Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Michael Lawrence Dolan, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were David P. Graham and David A. Prange., Kathryn E. Kovacs, Attorney, Appellate Section, Environment & Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief were Thomas L. Sansonetti, Assistant Attorney General and Sydney Cook, Attorney. Of counsel were E. Ann Peterson, Attorney; and Cheryl Schrempp Dupris, Attorney, United States Attorneys Office, of Pierre, South Dakota.