United States Federal Circuit
Parental Guide of Texas, Inc. v. Thomson, Inc., 05-1493
Summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where the district court properly determined that defendant did not owe plaintiff a contingent payment under a Release and License Agreement that had settled a previous patent infringement suit between the parties.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/21/2006
- Published 04/21/2006
Judges
- CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge., Before RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- G. Donald Puckett, Monts & Ware LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Brent N. Bumgardner. Of counsel was Mark William Born, of Austin, Texas.
- For Appellees:
- Karl L. Mulvaney, Bingham McHale LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was David O. Tittle. Of counsel on the brief were Joy M. Soloway, E. Lee Haag, and Andrew P. Price, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., of Houston, Texas; and Richard A. Huser and Meggan L. Ehret, Thomson Inc., of Indianapolis, Indiana.